|
After having written a short review of Dan Brown's The Da
Vinci Code (Okay, I admit it — I have to stoop
to some pretty low levels in my English reading while in Poland),
I recently received the oddest letter from a complete stranger.
The subject line: The DaVinci [sic] Code and The
DA Revelation of Avatar Adi Da Love-Ananda Samraj
Dear Gary,
My name is John Forth from Melbourne Australia. I got your
e-address from Amazon reviews.
The DaVinci [sic] Code is an interesting book
on an important theme: namely the suppression [sic]
of the gnostic [sic] strain in Christianity.
A suppresion [sic] which has turned out to be
a disaster for ALL beings on this planet.
With that in mind please check out The Divine Revelation
of Avatar Adi Da Love-Ananda Samraj at:
1. www.adidam.org
2. www.adi-da-samraj.org
A Prophetic Criticism of the "Great" Religions
(essays on how non-gnostic [sic] essentially
materialist Christianity took over) at:
3. http://www.dabase.net/proofch6.htm
Grace Shines
John Forth
My response, after checking out the links he'd provided, was
short: "What exactly does The Da Vinci Code
— which is a horrid book filled with historical errors
— have to do with a New Age cult?" Of course I
knew such a reply was antagonistic enough to get another response
out of him. In other words, I realized I was childishly provoking
him, but I couldn't help it. After all, it's not every day
that you get to speak to a cult apologist.
Mr. Forth replied:
Dear Gary,
Thankyou [sic] for your response.
IF you do your home work you will discover that Adidam
or The Way of the Heart created by Adi Da Samraj is not
a "new age" cult. Christianity is a cult. Every
body belongs to numerous cults. A cult being a group
of people from the very small or in the billions fascinated
by some object of desire or fascination.
Please check out "Beyond The Cultic Tendency in Religion----"
at: http://www.dabase.org/cultic.htm
You could say that the fascination with the Davinci [sic]
Code is a cultish [sic] phenomenon [sic].
AS are the cults associated with The Lord of the Rings,
the Matrix films, Star Trek etc etc [sic] Perhaps
the relevance to Adidam is that Adi Da addresses in a
very real way some of the themes, especially the repressed
gnostic [sic] elements of early christianity
[sic], mentioned in the Davinci [sic]
Code.
Grace Shines
John Forth
Leaving aside the question of what "home work" Mr.
Forth thought I was supposed to have done, I took him up on
his offer and read — or rather, scanned — the
piece Mr. Forth recommended, written by none other than the
guru himself: Avatar Adi Da Samraj.
It was full of Things Not Normally Capitalized which were written
in Capital Letters to express Their Importance (though he
did restrain from some cult/sect writers'
typographical IDOCYCRIES), and basically
filled with nonsensical Eastern guru babble. (I'm not suggesting
that Eastern wisdom is just "babble," just this
particular "wisdom.") Some choice quotes:
- The relationship to Me that is Described (by Me) in the
Ruchira Avatara Gita is not an exoteric cultic matter.
It is a profound esoteric discipline, necessarily associated
with real and serious and mature practice of the "radical"
Way (or root-Process) of Realizing Real God, Which Is
Reality and Truth. Therefore, in the Ruchira Avatara
Gita, I am critical of the ego-based (or self-saving,
and self-"guruing", rather than self-surrendering,
self-forgetting, self-transcending, and Divine-Guru-Oriented)
practices of childish, and, otherwise, adolescent, and,
altogether, merely exoteric cultism.
- Just so, the cult of religious and Spiritual fascination
tends to be equally righteous about maintaining fascinated
faith (or indiscriminate, and even aggressive, belief)
in the merely Parent-like "Divine" Status of
one or another historical individual, "God"-Idea,
religious or Spiritual doctrine, inherited tradition,
or force of cosmic Nature.
The piece mainly dealt with the issue of "cultism,"
which Adi Da claims is endemic in all religions — except
his own, of course. His is the antidote to cults. Clever move:
take critics' charges and aim the back at them.
Next step, I decided to do my "homework" that Mr.
Forth took me to task for not having done — particularly
easy with Google.
Soon I was flooded with information about Adi Da, Daism, and
assorted goodies.
The Guru
What's in a Name?
I was initially not sure whether to call this
charlatan "Franklin Jones" or "Adi
Da." Indeed, Jones himself cannot seem
to make up his mind as far as names go. (names.adida.org)
Continually referring to him as Jones makes
his claims seem particularly absurd, but since
they are currently published under the name,
it seems to make contextual sense to call him
"Adi Da."
In the end, I just oscillated back and forth. |
I
found out that — surprise, surprise — "Adi
Da" is in fact Franklin Jones, a sixty-something Long
Island born "guru" who has been holed up for over
twenty years in Fiji , where he dispenses his Eastern-tinged
"Crazy Wisdom" (his term, not mine) selflessly.
I scanned a bit of his stuff and it was quickly evident that
the guy is a fraud.
Jones' religion, his "Crazy Wisdom," is not a Siddhartha-type
Western understanding of Buddhism, something which might raise
the eyebrows a bit of a true Eastern master but cause no real
consternation. In other words, it's not some new meditation
method, some slightly commercialized take on yoga (i.e., twelve
positions for the supermarket checkout counter). Nothing so
insignificant as that.
The claim that Jones make — the heart of his religion —
is that he is an Avatar. A human manifestation of God. To frame
it in Western terms, Jones makes the same claim Jesus did: that
he is God incarnate. As he explains it:
I Am the Divine Heart-Master of every one, and of all,
and of the All of all. Therefore, I Call upon every one
(and all) to rightly and positively understand My Divine
Self-Revelation. And I Call upon every one (and all)
to truly devotionally recognize Me, and to responsively
demonstrate that devotional recognition of Me in the
context of, and by Means of, the right, true, full, and
fully devotional, and really counter-egoic, practice
of the only-by-Me Revealed and Given Way of Adidam (www.dabase.org)
.
He is the Set Apart Guide (I can't help lapsing into some Jones-esque
capitalization) for All those Who want to Know the Way. The
Way, coincidently, is Jones himself, so his teaching amounts
to how to recognize he is God. Indeed, followers are given
instructions that the best way to forget about ego is to meditate
on Jones, and since he's living it up in Fiji and not physically
available to all his followers, they're provided with a photo
album to help with the visualization!
Salvation, it seems, is based on fantasizing about a fat, bald,
literally slimey-looking (just scroll down a bit) New Yorker
with glaucoma.
The only Liberating discovery is that My Avataric Divine
Spiritual Presence is Real, able to be tangibly experienced
under any and all circumstances. It is not about imagining
My Spiritual Presence or manipulating yourself. None
of that is satisfying, in any case. To searchlessly [sic]
Behold Me and, in the midst of it, to notice My Spiritual
Presence tangibly moving upon you in your real experience—this
is the great and Liberating discovery, the only Satisfaction.
Ultimately, it is the only Satisfaction in life. Everything
else is temporary, conditional, ego-based, and disheartening.
Only the discovery of the tangible Reality of That Which
Is Divine is heartening and Liberating and Satisfactory
(adidam.org).
The practice is searchless, ego-forgetting, altogether
to-Me-turned Beholding of Me in My bodily (human)
Divine Form. When you are not in My physical
Company, you can recollect My bodily (human)
Divine Form. You can use My Murti-Form, My
Padukas, and so on. Persisting in this practice,
there is the potential of moving Me to Bless
you further. [March 24, 2003] (adidam.org)
|
I
closed my eyes and pictured him for a few moments and the
only result I got was a chill running down my back and a brief
paranoia that, like the catchy melody of the latest pop trash
hit, the image would keep popping back into my head unwanted.
The Suckers and Victims
The case of Franklin Jones and his AdidDaSes (the name "Adi
Da" supposed just came to him; perhaps he just glanced
down at someone's athletic shoes) would be more comic than
anything if it weren't for the people that follow him. The
difference between a cult leader and a raving schizophrenic
homeless man in a subway station is that someone has taken
the former seriously, and that's a frightening thought. What
makes a cult tragic is of course the devoted, mindless followers.
Jones' website speaks of "turning to him," of "recognizing
him," of "loving him." It's scary stuff. But
the words are not half as scary as the pictures — images
from the inside workings of a cultic compound. Imagine David
Koresh made pictures available of what went on in Waco. It
might look something like this:
And what's worse is the fact that there are children
being raised on this bullshit. Children of followers living
on Jones' Fiji island paradise are taught from birth (i.e.,
primarily socialization) that this snake-oil salesman is God.
It's difficult enough to deprogram adults who have surrendered
(voluntarily or not) their grip on reality, but these poor
kids will never have had a firm understanding of reality to
begin with, and they're going to be warped for life. It's
nothing short of child abuse, but unfortunately, such child
abuse is legal.

Thus armed, I dashed off a quick reply to Mr. Forth:
I read the piece to which you sent me the link, and I found
this passage:
All cults, whether sacred or secular, thrive on indulgence
in the psychology (and the emotional rituals) of
hope, rather than on actual demonstration of counter-egoic
and really ego-transcending action.
What is the difference between this "indulgence in
the psychology [. . .] of hope" and what Adi Da
offers? His form of TM simply offers the hope of getting
in touch with true reality.
I suppose, to some degree, as an atheist I would agree.
Any time we seek from a religion something beyond what
we experience in our senses, quantitatively confirmable
through science, we are indulging in "the psychology
[. . .] of hope."
Further, I would go so far as to say that Da is exploiting
this "psychology [. . .] of hope" to build
up his own cult. And for the record, I am using "cult"
in the sociological sense of the term. Like Jim Jones
(though I don't know that Da will go so far), he has
holed himself up in a remote corner of the world and
refuses contact with outsiders.
Concerning this, Ken Wilber asks,
[Da's] claim, of course, is that he is the most enlightened
person in the history of the planet. Just for argument,
let us agree. But then what would the most enlightened
World Teacher in history actually do in the world?
Hide? Avoid? Run? Or would that teacher engage the
world, step into the arena of dialogue, meet with
other religious teachers and adepts, attempt to
start a universal dialogue that would test his truths
in the fire of the circle of those who could usefully
challenge him. At the very least, a person who claims
to be the World Teacher needs to get out in the
world, no? (www.beezone.com)
Indeed, what does the Dali Lama think of Da? How is he
received in, say, India? Yes, yes, I know that some notables
(most disturbing, Allan Watts) have given credence to
Da's claim, but as far as I know, true spiritual leaders
don't have much to do with him.
| When I wrote this, I was still unaware of the
extent of Jones' claims to be God. As such,
it's a little flawed, for there does indeed
exist a Gnostic element in Daism — the
knowledge that a fat New Yorker is God. |
Now, as far as this and some connection to that horrid
The Da Vinci Code, I still fail to see the connection.
Gnosticism was not about mystical meditation but instead
knowledge. "Gnosis" means "knowledge,"
not meditation. The Da Vinci Code attempts to
rehabilitate the idea of the sacred feminine —
goddess worship, in other words — and not Christian
mysticism. If that's what Brown were trying to do in
writing "DC" he would have written about, say,
Father Pio. Instead, he wrote about Mary Magdalene, the
"proper" object of veneration in Christianity
as it was originally formulated.
In closing, I'd like to thank you for your emails, and
encourage you, if you are involved in Adi Da's cult,
to get yourself out as fast as possible.
Sincerely,
Gary Scott
I never heard from Mr. Forth again. I suppose he realized that
time trying to convert me was not time well spent, and I imagine
he's off emailing other people who submitted reviews of The
Da Vinci Code to Amazon.com.
The Ultimate Sell: Yourself
One question remains: to what degree does Franklin Jones believe
his own nonsense? There are two equally disturbing possibilities.
The first is that he simply knows that he's a charlatan and
realizes it's all a big scam. This seems unlikely, for a conscious
con-man, no matter how good he is, eventually slips up.
The second possibility is that he thinks he is God.
This simply means he belongs in an asylum. Indeed, the only
difference between Franklin Jones and the probably uncountable
number of Jesuses, Buddhas, Thors, and Jehovahs sitting around
in state hospitals is that Jones hasn't been locked away.
You can almost imagine a large nurse reassuring a pajama-clad
Jones, "Yes, Mr. Jones, I know that my salvation rests
on perfect contemplation of you. Now be a sweetie and take
your medicine . . ."
Resources
For those interested in subjecting themselves to more stupidity,
here are some of the links I used in researching Franklin
Jones.
- Adida.org
- Franklin Jones' official web site
- dabase.org
- Another pro-Franklin site that offers a lot of his Ridiculously
Capitalized Writings
- The
Today Show
- Transcript of NBC Today Show report on Franklin Jones,
May 1985
- The
Religious Movements Homepage Project
- Anne H. Smith's 1999 project for "Soc 257: New Religious
Movements" at the University of Virginia
- Charges
Against Frank
- "10 Reasons Adi Da Is Not Who He Says he Is"
|